?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Sick Sheik

Virginia Haussegger writes in today's Canberra Times:

As one of Australia's "most senior imams" and a respected Muslim cleric, Sheik Taj Aldin Alhali has every right to suggest women are nothing more than Satan's "best weapon" and little more than slabs of "meat" ripe for rape.

And the Mufti of Australia knows about meat. "If you don't put it in the fridge or in the pot", he told his Ramadan audience at Sydney's Lakemba Mosque last month, the cats will get at it - assuming they claw at it, ripping and shredding its surface, tearing open the flesh and gnawing the bone - well, you can hardly blame the cat for aving a go. "Is it the fault of the cat or the uncovered meat?" Alhali asked his devotees. His answer: "the uncovered meat is the problem".

And therein lies the Muslim preacher's problem. He can't see any difference between a slab or rotting carcass and Western women. Just like a piece of meat that's been eaten, Alhali blames women who are abused and raped for bringing t on themselves. "She disobeyed God and went out dolled up and unveiled and made of herself palatable food - she was the reason behind the sin". In fact, warming to his theme, he tells of how Muslim scholar al-Rafihi instructs that in a case of rape, the man should be disciplined and the woman "arrested and jailed for life".

Of course, the Muslim has every right to preach to his fellow Muslims a doctrine of women as off-cuts, ripe for the chewing. Just as he has the right to insist that women should stay hidden: "If the woman is in her boudoir, in her house and if she's wearing th hijab and if she shows modesty, disasters don't happen." If keeping women oppressed and and indoors and possessing them like "gems" and "jewels" as he explained to his daughter and insisting that they are forever vulnerable to attack, is the word of God that Alhali wants to preach, then so be it. He is entitled to preach whatever sadistic erotic fantasy fables he can dream up. After all, it's his God, his religion and his mindless flock - and this is a democracy.

The democratic right to free speech is a precious tool and perhaps the most important tenant of Australian freedom. And just as I respect Alhali's right to speak drivel, he should respect mine. Although I doubt he will as I'm one of the off-cut class who "wear make-up and powder", Western clothes, no veil, and I even occasionally "sway suggestively" when I'm dancing.

The putrid stench of Muslim misogyny created by the Mufti's foolish lecture will unfortunately linger longer. It must be heartbreaking for the wider Muslim community, particularly the women, who have worked hard in Australia to educate non-Muslims about the rich depth of their faith.

This set-back is more than just another embarrassing gaffe. Alhali has insulted jews by suggesting they are the "underlying cause of all wars"; faced deportation in 1982 for "inciting hatred"; and infamously suggested that the Sydney gang rapes were the fault of "Australian society". Each time, the Mufti has claimed that he was "misunderstood". Now he's claiming it again.

But really, are we shocked or even surprised by the Mufti's women-as-meat doctrine? We've heard suggestions of such a doctrine before.

During the notorious Sydney gang rape trial of six unnamed brothers, known as the "K brothers", there was much meadia breast beating about whether the accused men's cultural background and religion was relevant. It wasn't until the men themselves made it so. After every other legal tactic had failed, they tried playing the cultural card. They were Lebanese Muslims, they argued, and therefore came rom a background with "very traditional views about women". It seemed the boys believed those so-called "traditional views" would explain why they thought it was okay to torment, terrorise and viciously rape four teenage girls. In another similarly notorious and sickening case in Sydney which went to trial in 2002, it was revealed that a gang of 14 Lebanese Muslim boys specifically targeted young girls based on their ethnicity. During several hors of degradation and abuse the girls were repeatedly called "Aussie pigs", "sluts" and "whores".

Have the K brothers and the brutal Gang of 14 extrapolated bits and pieces of the Mufti's women-as-meat doctrine and understood it as permission to degrade women?

This is truly horrible stuff. And as many wise and no dout embarrassed Muslim community leaders across Australia are saying this week, enough! The Mufti has apologised to any women he may have offended, but it's too late for that.

Alhali has belled the cat, so to speak. His words are a graphic demonstration once again of the extreme mismatch between the values of an ancient religion - as interpretted by a patronising misogynist - with a modern society.

The Mufti's vile meat metaphor speaks loudly to those of us who cannot understand why some women subject themselves to the oppression of something as extreme as he burqa, simply because their husbands tell them they must.

Certainly, many muslim women will chose to wear the head scarf, or hijab, as a measure of piety and a symbolic gesture, just as my Catholic grandmother used to wear a lace Mantilla to church. But to those women forced to hide their body, their face, even their eyes from the world outside their home, I ask, what God would possibly insist on that? Is that kind of insulting and inhuman coverage of Muslim women simply to placate the controlling obsessions of men like the Mufti of Australia?

Apology not accepted.

Comments

( 3 comments — Leave a comment )
laruth
27th Oct, 2006 22:50 (UTC)
Great post from Virginia Hausseger!
hawkeye7
29th Oct, 2006 08:07 (UTC)
It occurred to me that people outside Canberra might not know who Virginia is and might not be able to look her up. I found her surname was misspelled in her Wikipedia entry, which I have since corrected.
mintogrubb
28th Oct, 2006 09:11 (UTC)
And yet moslem men who step onto the tube trains in London with their robes robes and backpacks will trigger an immediate response from securty staff who will stand them against the wall and search them.

maybe western men are 'animals' and we all know how animals behave when they feel threatened.

yet , strangely enough, these Muslims in Britain, who flaunt their beirds and their robes and carry back packs in a threatening and provocative fashion, even when they ar not loaded with actual bombs are pleading for ' tolerance and understanding'.

You tolerate and understand us, and we well do the same, Mr Moslem.
( 3 comments — Leave a comment )